Is the concept of mutual co-existence even practically possible or is it too idealistic?
“Mutual co-existence” breaks down if you define it as ‘everyone agrees, no friction, no conflict.’ That is idealistic. Humans have competing needs, values, and limits. Erase that and you erase what makes us human. Where it becomes practical is when you shift the definition: Co-existence ≠ agreement, the key switch that makes the whole idea…
